Whether a person talks with a reporter, a state legislator or others, it's important to be prepared for "tough questions."
Tough questions should be answered directly-short and simple-and then used as a "bridge" to return to your own key messages.
Don't be defensive. Your tone should be positive and respectful, but firm.
I'm ____. I'm from [town]. I'm here with NAMI, the National Alliance on Mental Illness.
If you vote: Yes. I live in [town] and I vote.
If you're new to voting: I live in [town] in your district. I haven't voted before, but I am going to vote in the next election because mental health care is important to me.
If appropriate: So does my [spouse, parents, son or daughter, cousins, etc.].
*Note: It's essential in meeting with a legislator that a person or most of a group be from the legislator's district. Legislators want to know if you live in their district because, if you do, you are one of their constituents. If you are a constituent, you represent a potential future vote for them--regardless of whether you voted for them, their opponent or didn't vote at all in the last election.
If mental health programs are cut, then it's going to cost the state money elsewhere. Money won't be saved. That's pennywise and pound foolish.
Costs are going to be shifted to schools, police, emergency rooms, hospitals, jails and prisons. Families, neighbors and co-workers will pay a high price if people don't get the mental health care they need. And businesses will lose productivity because of absenteeism-which costs them money.
The problem isn't going to go away. And the bottom line is that lives are at stake. Children and youth will lose critical developmental years. Many people won't recover. Some people may even die.
Legislators have to make those choices. We're here to talk about how mental illness affects us and the value of mental health care. Mental health care hasn't been adequately funded in the past--and in these economic times, demand is increasing.
We have to save mental health. Treatment works. Mental health saves lives and promotes recovery. The legislature needs to make wise, careful choices. They shouldn't make choices that are penny-wise and pound foolish.
We're asking that mental health be protected and strengthened in a time of increasing need for treatment. It's up to legislators to figure out how to accomplish that. Mental health services are a wise investment that benefits our families, our businesses and our communities. The legislature shouldn't make cuts in mental health that will only end up costing money elsewhere.
We all know someone who is affected by mental illness, so cuts to mental health touch us all.
* Note: Tell a brief one to two-minute version of your personal story-or that of a family member or another person in your local group. (It's best if the person is present to tell it themselves). Make sure that the story relates to how community mental health services have contributed to recovery.
Cuts to the mental health budget will mean that people will go without the help they need. Cuts to mental health programs can result in lost work time, poor school performance, greater family stress and burnout. When crisis services are cut, police are taken off the beat to respond to psychiatric crises when they could be protecting our communities.
You'd be surprised:
What we want to see in the state are proven, cost-effective mental health services, especially programs that are recognized as "evidence-based practices."
Those are the ones that represent the foundation of the future. We want to protect existing funding and strengthen services by focusing on the best treatment practices.
In Maine, there's been a proposal to freeze mental health funding while looking at prioritizing the most effective and cost-efficient services through a special commission. That's one approach.
We want to protect mental health, not weaken it. We already have shortages of mental health professionals and treatment services. Cuts to programs will weaken an already fragile system of mental health care and simply shifts costs to other public services.
A lot of progress has been made in recent years in developing "best practices" for mental health care and proven, cost-effective programs.
The problem is that most states haven't adopted them.
That's why the national average is D.
The report card measured a state's progress toward best practices. But that doesn't mean the state's existing system should be thrown out.
We need to protect mental health while strengthening it. It needs to be transformed, but cuts aren't the solution. You can't move forward if you are moving backward.
It's not just a few.
People living with mental illness and their families aren't trivial.
We know that treatment works. Different degrees of recovery are possible and as treatment and support are strengthened, the outlook gets better. That's why we want to protect and strengthen programs.
Many manage their illness successfully, but those people with the most severe conditions often end up on Medicaid or, worse, uninsured.
Mental illness doesn't discriminate. It affects men and women, the young and old and Democrats, Republicans and Independents alike. Even the families of our elected officials.
Support NAMI to help millions of Americans who face mental illness every day.Donate today
Inspire others with your message of hope. Show others they are not alone.Share your story
Become an advocate. Register on NAMI.org to keep up with NAMI news and events.Join NAMI Today