NAMI - National Alliance on Mental Illness Home | About NAMI | Contact Us | En Espanol  | Donate  
Find
  Advanced Search  
 

Sign In
myNAMI
Communities
Register and Join
Donate
What's New
State & Local NAMIs
Advocate Magazine
NAMI Newsroom
NAMI Store
NAMIWALKS
National Convention
Special Needs Estate Planning
NAMI Travel

 About Public Policy
  Current News & Alerts
  Policy Reports
  Policy Topics
   Health Care Reform
  Policy Research Institute
  Child & Adolescent Action Center
  Assertive Community Treatment (ACT)
  NAMI Policy Platform
  CIT
  New Freedom Commission

Print this page
Graphic Site
Log Out
 | Print this page | 
 | 
Issue_Spotlights

NAMI Joins “Friend of the Court Brief” Supporting Medicaid Provisions in the Affordable Care Act

NAMI has joined 38 colleague national organizations in filing an Amicus (Friend of the Court) brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Florida v. HHS challenging the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act. The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case on Mar. 26-28, 2012. A decision is expected in late June or early July. While the consolidated cases that the Court will cover a range of issues, including the constitutionality of the individual mandate to have health insurance, the brief that NAMI joined was restricted to a critical issue for children and adults living with mental illness, the law’s expansion of Medicaid eligibility up to 138 percent of the poverty level.

The brief that NAMI joined asserts that the case for overturning the expansion of Medicaid eligibility jeopardizes not just Medicaid, but also a host of other federal programs and antidiscrimination protections that hinge on the Constitution’s “Spending Clause.” The Spending Clause allows Congress to offer states money, with conditions, to encourage states to participate in a joint federal-state effort to address a range of policy needs including safety net services such as mental health services, education, child welfare, highway safety, property rights, and discrimination based on race, gender or disability. If a state disagrees with the conditions that accompany the federal money, the state can decline the money. The brief argues that if the Supreme Court holds that the Medicaid Expansion is unconstitutional, then an array of cooperative federal-state spending programs could become subject to constitutional challenge.

Posted: February 17, 2012


 | Print this page | 
 | 

Donate

Support NAMI to help millions of Americans who face mental illness every day.

Donate today

Speak Out

Inspire others with your message of hope. Show others they are not alone.

Share your story

Get Involved

Become an advocate. Register on NAMI.org to keep up with NAMI news and events.

Join NAMI Today
Home  |  myNAMI  |  About NAMI  |  Contact Us  |  Jobs  |  SiteMap

Copyright © 1996 - 2011 NAMI. All Rights Reserved.